Finance · Indiana University

Fahiz Baba-Yara

Assistant Professor of Finance
Kelley School of Business

I study risk, return predictability, and the models used to measure them.

My research combines empirical asset pricing, financial econometrics, and machine learning.

Portrait of Fahiz Baba-Yara

Research

Published & working papers

  1. Journal of Financial Economics · 2024

    Persistent and Transitory Components of Firm Characteristics: Implications for Asset Pricing

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Martijn Boons, and Andrea Tamoni

    Persistent and transitory components of firm characteristics earn different compensation, with the pattern varying across characteristics.

    More about this paper: Persistent and Transitory Components of Firm Characteristics: Implications for Asset Pricing

    Following portfolios beyond their formation date reveals return patterns that benchmark factor models struggle to explain.

    Neither the persistent nor the transitory component is uniformly dominant.

    History matters for expected returnsTwo schematic histories meet at the same current characteristic value. Persistent and transitory components can carry different compensation; neither dominates across all characteristics.
    History matters for expected returns
    • Solid: persistent history
    • Dashed: recent change
    • Left to right: past to present
    Schematic · not data
  2. Review of Finance · 2021

    Value Return Predictability across Asset Classes and Commonalities in Risk Premia

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Martijn Boons, and Andrea Tamoni

    Value spreads predict value-strategy returns across asset classes, with a substantial common component.

    More about this paper: Value Return Predictability across Asset Classes and Commonalities in Risk Premia

    A common component captures about two-thirds of the predictability, while the remainder is specific to each asset class.

    This is a share of return predictability, not a share of realized return variation.

    A common signal across asset classesA common component in value spreads helps forecast value returns across representative asset classes. The drawing does not show realized-return covariance or estimated coefficients.
    A common signal across asset classes
    • Left: shared component of value spreads
    • Right: example asset classes—equities, commodities, currencies, bonds
    Schematic · not data
  3. Working paper · March 2026 version

    In Search of Sparsity: Bayesian Sparse Factor Models and the Factor Zoo

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Massimiliano Bondatti, and Robert Hill

    A sparse Bayesian model condenses many candidate factors into a small set of latent risks.

    More about this paper: In Search of Sparsity: Bayesian Sparse Factor Models and the Factor Zoo

    Three latent factors summarize the factor zoo in this empirical application.

    The model accounts for uncertainty about the factor structure rather than treating the selected structure as known.

    Many candidates, a sparse structureA field of candidate factors connects to three latent factors, illustrating the summary in this empirical application. The geometry is schematic, not estimated data.
    Many candidates, a sparse structure
    • Left: candidate factors
    • Right: three latent factors in this application
    Schematic · not data
  4. Working paper · March 2026 version

    Commodity Returns: Lost in Financialization

    Fahiz Baba-Yara and Massimiliano Bondatti

    Commodity strategy returns declined around financialization, especially for strategies with greater exposure to benchmark indices.

    More about this paper: Commodity Returns: Lost in Financialization

    We link the decline to benchmark-tracking capital that broadens risk sharing and changes which investors set prices.

    Greater index exposure, larger declineTwo schematic pairs associate greater index exposure with a larger decline in strategy returns. The geometry is schematic, not estimated data.
    Greater index exposure, larger decline
    • Top: lower exposure, smaller decline
    • Bottom: higher exposure, larger decline
    Schematic · not data
  5. Working paper

    The Multifactor Risk-Return Tradeoff

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Martijn Boons, and Rik Frehen

    Accounting for covariances reveals a positive multifactor risk–return tradeoff in the paper’s tests.

    More about this paper: The Multifactor Risk-Return Tradeoff

    Risk depends on how factors move together, not just on their individual variances.

    Risk includes the off-diagonal termsA covariance matrix highlights off-diagonal covariances alongside diagonal variances. The paper finds a positive multifactor risk–return tradeoff when covariances are included; the cells encode neither covariance signs nor estimated magnitudes.
    Risk includes the off-diagonal terms
    • Filled diagonal: variances
    • Outlined pairs: covariances
    • Signs and magnitudes are not shown
    Schematic · not data
  6. Working paper · March 2024 draft

    Risk from the Inside Out: Understanding Firm Risk through Employee News Consumption

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Fotis Grigoris, and Preetesh Kantak

    Employee attention to macroeconomic news helps measure firms’ exposure to macroeconomic risk.

    More about this paper: Risk from the Inside Out: Understanding Firm Risk through Employee News Consumption

    Firms whose employees read more macroeconomic news beforehand are more exposed to subsequent changes in economic conditions.

    An earlier draft circulated as “Are Uncertain Firms Riskier?”

    News attention as a measure of exposureNews attention and firm risk exposure are linked by a measurement relationship, not a causal arrow. The geometry is schematic, not estimated data.
    News attention as a measure of exposure
    • Left: employee news attention
    • Right: firm risk exposure
    • Dashed link: measurement, not causation
    Schematic · not data
  7. Working paper

    The Limits of Factor Model Spanning

    Fahiz Baba-Yara, Brian H. Boyer, and Carter Davis

    High-Sharpe factor models can disagree about which returns they explain.

    More about this paper: The Limits of Factor Model Spanning

    A strong performance metric does not by itself establish that one model spans another.

    Strong models need not span each otherTwo overlapping, non-nested regions illustrate models that leave different payoffs unexplained. The regions are a visual analogy, not literal linear subspaces or estimated data.
    Strong models need not span each other
    • Left outline: model A
    • Right outline: model B
    Schematic · not data
  8. Working paper

    Machine Learning and Return Predictability Across Firms, Time and Portfolios

    Fahiz Baba-Yara

    Economic restrictions help a neural network generalize from individual stocks to market and portfolio returns.

    More about this paper: Machine Learning and Return Predictability Across Firms, Time and Portfolios

    I build economic restrictions into the network’s architecture, then examine forecasts across firms, time, portfolios, and horizons.

    Economic restrictions support generalizationStock-level inputs pass through economic restrictions toward forecasts for firms, time and portfolios. In this paper, these restrictions support generalization; the drawing does not promise that every restricted neural network will improve.
    Economic restrictions support generalization
    • Left: stock-level inputs
    • Center: economic restrictions
    • Right: firms, time, portfolios
    Schematic · not data

Teaching & service

In the classroom

I teach Intermediate Investments (BUS-F 303) at Indiana University.

Students can find course materials and announcements on Canvas.

I have refereed for the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Journal of Empirical Finance, and Quarterly Journal of Finance.

Contact

Get in touch

Please email me with questions about my research, data, or replication code.

fababa@iu.edu
Department of Finance
Kelley School of Business
Indiana University · Bloomington